<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010: The Year of the In-house Lawyer or the Attractive Lawyer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solicitr.com/2010/03/18/2010-the-year-of-the-in-house-lawyer-or-the-attractive-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solicitr.com/2010/03/18/2010-the-year-of-the-in-house-lawyer-or-the-attractive-lawyer/</link>
	<description>Legal News, Legal Views, Law News, Legal Jobs, Law Jobs, Training Contracts, Training Contract News, Legal Humour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Attractive Lawyers Earn More &#171; Legal News, Legal Views, Law News, Legal Jobs, Law Jobs, Training Contracts, Training Contract News, Legal Humour</title>
		<link>http://www.solicitr.com/2010/03/18/2010-the-year-of-the-in-house-lawyer-or-the-attractive-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>Attractive Lawyers Earn More &#171; Legal News, Legal Views, Law News, Legal Jobs, Law Jobs, Training Contracts, Training Contract News, Legal Humour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solicitr.com/?p=1889#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>[...] have questioned whether 2010 would be the year of the attractive lawyer but it seems our question was too narrow. Every year [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have questioned whether 2010 would be the year of the attractive lawyer but it seems our question was too narrow. Every year [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.solicitr.com/2010/03/18/2010-the-year-of-the-in-house-lawyer-or-the-attractive-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-3998</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solicitr.com/?p=1889#comment-3998</guid>
		<description>Can someone tell me.

How did Freshfields get its &quot;beautiful and bright&quot; reputation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone tell me.</p>
<p>How did Freshfields get its &#8220;beautiful and bright&#8221; reputation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is this any way to treat legal recruiters? &#171; Legal News, Legal Views, Law News, Legal Jobs, Law Jobs, Training Contracts, Training Contract News, Legal Humour</title>
		<link>http://www.solicitr.com/2010/03/18/2010-the-year-of-the-in-house-lawyer-or-the-attractive-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-3993</link>
		<dc:creator>Is this any way to treat legal recruiters? &#171; Legal News, Legal Views, Law News, Legal Jobs, Law Jobs, Training Contracts, Training Contract News, Legal Humour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solicitr.com/?p=1889#comment-3993</guid>
		<description>[...] you read the last post and have even an ounce of insecurity about your looks, you might like recruiters even less than you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you read the last post and have even an ounce of insecurity about your looks, you might like recruiters even less than you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
