
Legal eaglets: law student stereotypes and to tattoo or not tattoo
There are many things young professionals need to consider when entering into their chosen career path; the most fitting stereotype probably is not one of them but how about getting a tattoo? Stereotypes entertain and irritate in equal measure and lawyers seem to insight probably more than their fair share but one contributor at the Times has come up with some amusing observations of his fellow law students… As an undergraduate, I shared a house with ancient historians and literature …
There are many things young professionals need to consider when entering into their chosen career path; the most fitting stereotype probably is not one of them but how about getting a tattoo? Stereotypes entertain and irritate in equal measure and lawyers seem to insight probably more than their fair share but one contributor at the Times has come up with some amusing observations of his fellow law students…
As an undergraduate, I shared a house with ancient historians and literature buffs. While reasonably tolerant of me, they were dismissive of law students as a breed – and regarded us as a uniformly dull and avaricious bunch. I sought in vain to explain that, contrary to popular belief, there are numerous distinct species to be found in any given land law seminar . . .
Flick forward for the law student lowdown and a taste of the tattoo temptation discussion…
Young Rumpole
Has an unfeasibly bouffant hairdo. His baritone echoes through the faculty corridors, followed by the manly thud of slapped backs. Mooting fails to provide sufficient opportunities for him to practise so he weaves it into everyday life. Tutorials are a chance to present lengthy and passionate moral defences of fictional characters. At lunch he picks pedantic arguments with canteen staff.
Sloaney Layabout
Young Rumpole likes to socialise with Sloaney Layabout and sometimes wishes he shared his insouciance, as well as his taste in rugby shirts. Layabout does not enjoy studying, but he does approve of the law. It’s traditional, masculine and certain — or at least it would be if the idiot Government wouldn’t keep changing it. He often has no idea what anyone is talking about.
Activist Lawyer
With her cropped hair, shemagh scarf and badges, Activist Lawyer cuts a striking figure. Scowling at both injustice and her fellow students, she notes that none has yet volunteered for her community pro bono surgery.
Bentham’s Pupil
Has studiously unkempt hair and an egg-stained corduroy jacket. He has a copy of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law secreted inside Dixon’s Modern Land Law . Throughout land law seminars, he wonders why he is being forced to retain astonishingly dull information about squatters, and instead tries to think hard about the Grundnorm.
Foreign Guy
From China. Though never entirely clear on what he expected from a British university education, he feels increasingly sure that it isn’t this.
Magic Trainee
At the front of the class, Magic Trainee neatly completes her 19th vacation placement application. As president of the Law Society, editor of the faculty journal and captain of the departmental hockey team, she will not encounter undue difficulty in securing a traineeship at one of the larger City firms. She wonders whether it would be physically possible to complete two vacation placements simultaneously. With time- management skills like hers, anything is possible.
The Plodders
Plodders anxiously fiddle with piles of scrappy notes, none of which is presented in plastic wallets. They judge that while their degree is useful, it won’t be until they embark on their LPCs that they’ll start amassing career-valuable knowledge. They consequently restrict themselves to doing the minimum required to scrape a 2.1. Though they might drop by on the Law Society’s boozing sessions, they tend to find Magic Trainee and Young Rumpole quite tiring company.
Well its not difficult to pick your legal student personality from that bunch – or at least we didn’t find it overly arduous at any rate…
How about tattoos in the office then? Corprette has set out a survey to discover just what the consensus is. Here are a few of the comments that it attracted:
Reasonable?
"I have one on my arm and one on my shoulder (I’m an attorney). Both are covered when I wear a jacket but both are often visible in the office in everyday business casual. It’s never been a problem at any job I’ve held.
I’d hesitate to get one that can’t be covered up in interviews, court or meetings with potential clients. You don’t want to get dinged because some old fart in a position of power is judgmental toward people with tattoos. If your ankle tattoo would be covered up when wearing a pantsuit, I’d say go for it."
Harsh?
"tattoos are for hookers. not lawyers. don’t get one. then you won’t have to worry about covering it or not."
Sensible?
"If you have to ask whether a tattoo would be appropriate, don’t get a tattoo. If you work at a corporate law firm, please stay away from tattoo parlors. You have bigger problems to face than whether or not to get ink injected under a few layers of skin. Your life is a never-ending series of meaningless squabbles."
Seems like there is a lack of consensus there, how do you feel about this one?
Got a story? Contact team solicitr










October 20, 2008
this is great…
October 20, 2008
What about an invisable tattoo or one which would only appear in certain scenes. use your head people.
October 20, 2008
I would consider conspicuous tattoos in the workplace imprudent even for non fee-earning staff, although that might be overly exclusive if it were a strict rule. I recollect seeing one female trainee sporting a tattoo for all to see during some sort of trainee presentation we did a couple of years ago. The vulgarity of it was only overshadowed by the fact that it was across her lower back just above the ‘T’ of her G-string which could only be described as being made of fake diamonds (to hazard a fairly safe guess). Classy it was not.
August 20, 2009
I got a tattoo on my back and I’m a straight distinction student, if someone’s going to bitch about it they need to get their heads checked, there is life outside the firm and you need to not just be a robot doing the same things every day, there is a lot of people at uni who look at students with tats and assume they are idiots, but it is always funny when the results come out and realising who is on top.
Imo sensible tattoo’s that are personal, not dumb stuff that is pointless and something you did to show off then there shouldn’t be a problem, however with law being a profession run by dinosaurs it is hard to bring them into an acceptable thing, it’ll just take time.
August 20, 2009
as long as the older generation runs the political system and law systems, tattoos will be still be looked at as a sign of “low class, and trashy slutty or rebellious”. Now for the good news. Our generation will soon take over theirs and since we basically see tattoos as more of a meaning then low class it will be more tolerable =). Im in the love with the art of tattoos and piercings and im in love with the legal system… does it make me a bad person to have tattoos and piercings with a 4.0 GPA??