Comments on: Mosely wins £60k – Boon for Privacy or Blow for Tabloids' Freedom of Expression?

By: davied

davied — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:38 +0000

This is an attempt at inhibiting the press through the courts; fortunately they have enough cash not to let this minor setback letting them report freely…

By: not saying

not saying — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:59:02 +0000

im still interested.

Not.

a dedicated daily mail reader…

By: blogbelle

blogbelle — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:58:22 +0000

I can’t see why there is a public interest, I had never really heard much about this guy until recently. If you watch sexcetera you would see that what he got up to doesn’t seem that outrageous – loads of people do kinky stuff in private surroundings (some not so private too), what’s the big deal?

By: City Mickey

City Mickey — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:55:04 +0000

Tha’t nonsense the poor guy was having a bit of fun in his own time in a private place, why should he have his life runined over something like that. You might find it interesting or distasteful for whatever reason but there is no genuine public interest there, just tabloids trying to sell more of their intellectually devoid rag to anyone who is still interested…

By: not saying

not saying — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:54:46 +0000

Wasnt the legal fees for the case in the region of £1Mn?

thats why i love law.

inrespective of the outcome. you still get paid.

By: davied

davied — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:51:44 +0000

I think that he should have got nothing, everyone wants to read this stuff, he is a public figure – fair play!